Quick, here’s a question for you: If your child came home from a night out and told you he’d gotten into a drunken altercation and knocked someone out, what would you do?
Answer: You’d probably chastise him, and then fret all night until you were sure the police weren’t going to chap the door. You wouldn’t grass on him, after all, these things happen sometimes, but you wouldn’t be happy about it. That’s entirely reasonable, and understandable.
Result: 10/10 parenting.
From left field, here’s another question: If he came back from a work night out and confessed to having cheated on his girlfriend with a colleague, what would you do?
Answer: Probably tell him to come clean, that his partner deserves the truth and that if they’re meant to be, they’ll work through it. Ultimately, you won’t say anything to her, for it’s his responsibility, and you trust that he is a good man.
Result: 10/10 parenting.
3rd question: If your son came home and told you that his friend had hired him a prostitute, what would you do?
Answer: You’d either chuckle and slap him on the back like the old dog you are, be repulsed, or nag him about wether he used protection or not. Or, just role your eyes at that erstwhile son of yours. Either way, you’ve run a bath and ordered him in it.
Result: 10/10 parenting.
4th question: If your son came home and told you that his friend had hired him an underaged prostitute to rape, what would you do?
Answer: Probably use taxpayers money to fund a (Approx: £14,000,000) legal defence to protect your absurdly rich and entitled pedophilic son…
Result: 10/10 Queen Elizabeth.
…The very same pedophile son, it has to be noted, who was more than able to secure a mortgage of some £13m, to purchase a luxury ski chalet in Verbier, no less. Surely then, he can afford to fund his own legal fees? After all, £13m is just about enough money to cover it. But no, run to mummy and the taxpayers, you odious little fuck.
5th question: If a pedophile lived at the end of your street, would you take him his shopping, check on him in the winter?
6th question: If a pedophile lived in a mansion outside of your town, would you go out of your way to comp his gas and electric bills? Would you re-tile his roof, clean his gutters?
Answer: You already do.
⁃ Accounts for 2018-19 show the monarchy cost the taxpayer £67 million – an increase of almost £20,000,000 in the previous financial year. And it’s obviously needed, seeing as they employ roughly 1,700 people to wipe their arses after they’ve hand fed them. They don’t actually need that many staff to meet their needs. No reasonably sized family does. It’s as simple as that.
⁃ Prince Andrew was photographed with Epstein in Central Park in 2010. At that time Epstein was a registered sex offender who had served 13 months in prison on prostitution-related charges. Obviously, Andrew was way to busy buying pizza’s for the fam to be aware of any of that.
⁃ Prince Andrew will keep his £300,000-a-year taxpayer-funded bodyguards after complaining to his mumsy wumsy. Prince Andrew was, quite rightly set to lose all three protection officers, following a Home Office cost-cutting review. Of course, mummy stepped in and put pay to that. 10/10 parenting there Lizzie!
⁃ Sources estimate that the total Royal Family security team costs the taxpayers over £100,000,000..annually.
⁃ Prince Andrew once went and spent £15,848 of taxpayers’ money on a private jet so he that he could hop over to Northern Ireland and watch the Open. According to royal officials, the poor Prince just had “no other ways” of getting there, you understand. Funnily enough, on that particular day, there was actually 13 commercial flights to Belfast that he could have chosen to take instead. Saving us working class reprobates a cool £15,733 in the process. Just food for thought.
Result: 10/10 supporting of sex offenders.
It doesn’t really matter anyway, this of me pointing all of the above out. For the royal parasite and her egg-laying brood are simply above the laws which otherwise govern their subjects, and can therefore show their most utter contempt at following. After all, who is there that would even dare take them to task if they did break said laws? The government? Of course they wouldn’t. Why would they? And neither would the fawning, sycophantic, forelock tugging British press and media either, seeing as they so desperately depend on all things “the firm” to sell their lies printed on bog paper. And these thin-bloodied, attic-dwelling products of serious, pug-levels of inbreeding don’t care one iota about flouting this in our faces. They know they’re untouchable, and they know that we know that. What does it matter to them then, if we know that we pay to keep the lights on in every single one of their palaces, castles, and mansions, when there is absolutely zero that we can do about it from the doorways of our rented one bedroom flats?
Here’s another question: If I expected you and your neighbours to pay for my living expenses, for absolutely no discernible reason at all, other than that God chose me to be better than all of you, would you?
There coming thick and fast now! Question: If I expected you and your entire street to pay for several dozen maids, chefs, butlers and gardeners to tend to my home and every whim, would you? And of course you’re also expected to stump the bill for my lay about children as well, obviously. Sound fair?
9th question: If I wanted to go on a skiing holiday to Switzerland for two weeks, would you give me the money to take my entire family with me, and not just pay for our flights either, but our accommodation as well (5 stars only mind). Oh, and don’t forget spending money. We’ll definitely be needing spending money. Would you pay for that too please? I’ am much better than you, after all.
10th question: If you answered yes to any of the above questions, then could you also give money to a little known, but really important charity called NAMBLA?
Note: Thanks to a successful challenge against the tax bill, the Queen pays lower rates than the local primary school near Balmoral.
⁃ See, she’s a taxpayer, just like us!
Sycophantic English patriot
Note: In May, Prince William emphasised the importance of Scotland to the family in a speech to the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland during a week-long tour, referring to the links he and wife Kate have with St Andrews and saying of his children: “George, Charlotte and Louis already know how dear Scotland is to both of us, and they are starting to build their own happy memories here, too”
⁃ Ach, that settles it lads, call independence off! Call it off! Mind Prince William and his
Cinead MacAlpinehostagebeardwife Kate went to St Andrews, so we basically belong to them. And also, their spoilt wee weans are starting to develop good memories here, so we can’t in good conscience disrupt that, can we? Not like they won’t be able to holiday in an independent Scotland, after all. That would just be absurd.
Note: In the 2019-2020 fiscal year, Charles and Camilla received nearly £22.2 mil in income from the Duchy of Cornwall, and almost £2mil of funding from the Sovereign Grant allotted to subsidize their official royal activities.
⁃ Maybe get rid of one of your many mansions Charles, and then you wouldn’t need that extra £2mil from us unwashed, flat-renting peasants. Food for thought.
Not Charles’ conscience
Side note: The Duchy of Cornwall is worth around £1,000,000,000,000. The Sovereign Grant itself (Another thing we pay for) is worth around £44,400,000. Not too shabby a wage for a family whose God-given right it is to lord over us.
Not a bad living for Britain’s biggest benefit scroungers then, eh? Oh, do you think that’s a tad hyperbolic? Well, let me tell you, second on the list of scroungers would be this scum tribe, who, for a mere £95,000 a year, do exactly the same amount of work as the Windsors. Only, they take fewer holidays at our expense. Worth noting also, is that the third on the list of Britain’s biggest benefit scroungers, unlike Andrew, could barely afford to take a private jet to the open once a year, let alone once upon a greedy whim.
Now, it should come as no surprise to anyone that I’am by no means a monarchist. I’am an independence supporting republican (Republican in the European sense). This post isn’t about that though, nor is it about why that family should be abolished. More, it is simply about how this family just takes and takes and takes, and expects to be given everything they want without question, and do so with all the God-sanctioned presumptuousness of literal parasites. And like the parasite, they do not think of their host, nor do they thank them for the blood or the nutrients. They simply expect it, with all the same unerring animalistic entitlement of a creature used to living in a world devoid of reality where only those around it serve to feed and fatten it. Like to the parasite, we’re are all but blood and fat to the English royal brood.
Note: According to the Crown Estate’s annual report for 2019/20, the value of the British royal land portfolio fell by 1.2 percent, to £13.4 billion in 2020 due to the Covid-19 impacting tourism etc.
⁃ Oh no, that poor old Lizzie really could do with a wee helping hand from us plebs then, eh? At least enough for her to keep the heating on, poor old dear. I mean, she’s basically just like our own wee grannies, and we wouldn’t want them to go without heating. Heavens forbid! They can barely afford to feed themselves as it is.
Not Cinead MacAlpine being sarcastic
Final question: If your granny was harbouring your pedo uncle, would you not go in and have a word with the old dear about why that’s wrong?
Cinead MacAlpine.
nuairathigairduinethigairuile 